Evolution: Science and Religion Essay -- essays research papers fc

Evolution Science and ReligionIn 1895 Charles Darwin published a book describing his surmise of organic evolution, and his theory of the natural selection routine. This theory caused much uproar in the religious community because Darwins theory went against the story of creation portrayed in the beatified Bible. His theory claimed that all life currently in place had evolved and adapted from a single organism in the beginning. Over time and by process of natural selection only the dominant species were left over while the other, less dominant species, went extinct. His theory, backed by scientific analysis, had dismissed the idea of a single deity creating all life on Earth. It is not like Darwin had a personal agenda against religion or any(prenominal)thing, only when he did frame what would become the main evidence used by atheists to disprove the Bible. Now his theory is still theory, and is yet to be proven as a fact, entirely is still believed by much of the scientific society as a fact. The struggle between the religious and the atheistic will rage for many years, but where the battle will cause the most damage is in the American school system. The thesis of this paper is, teachers must(prenominal) be required to teach evolution which is already in place in the American school system, but teachers cannot be allowed to teach evolution as a fact, or evidence disproving the creative activity of a god. On top of all of that, they must as well allow the expression of opposing viewpoints.In the American school system in that respect is a constant separation of Church and State. This separation is undisputedly good for keeping the civil rights of students in order. By not allowing the pressures of church in schools, pile of power cannot abuse their power for religious preferences. Richard W. Garnett wrote in an article, the separation of church and state is crucial to any attractive vision of religious freedom (Garnett). tenet children unproven bel ief as a fact is just as bad as the forcing of religious beliefs on a student. In the end teachers must learn the importance of teaching evolutionary theories as theory only, and never as actual fact.The clash of creationism and evolution has begun once again. On one slope sits the Christians and believers of the Holy Bible as a literal piece of history on the other side sits scientists who dismantle any belief in any sort of God. The... ...whether you believe in a deity, or none at all it will require some faith on your part (Johnson). whole caboodle CitedBehe, Michael J. The Concept of Gradual Evolution is Flawed. Creationism vs. Evolution. Ed. By Bruno J. Leone. San Diego, CA Greenhaven Press, 2002 22.Branch, Glenn. Creationists and the Grand Canyon. Humanist Mar./April 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004 Garnett, Richard W. Keep it to Yourself. Commonweal Aug. 13 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004 Johnson, Matt. Pe rsonal Interview. 18 Jan. 2005Klyce, Brig. Evolution versus Creationism. Panspermia. 14 Oct. 2004 Moore, Randy and Jay Hatch and Murray Jensen. Twenty Questions What Have the Courts Said well-nigh the Teaching of Evolution and Creationism in Public Schools? Bioscience August 2003 EBSCOhost, Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 29 September 2004 Sheler, Jeffrey. The Pope and Darwin. U.S. News and gentleman Report 4 October 1996 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 29 September 2004 Wells, Jonathan. Elusive Icons of Evolution. Natural History April 2004 EBSCOhost. Seaside High School Lib., Seaside, OR 14 Oct. 2004