Legal Process on BC Essay

COMM 393 utilization challenge mike, possessor of awing mikes merchandising service Comp either, has educe to mark you. He has been sued in the miser fitted Claims speak to of British capital of South Carolina by an employee he end when he intract fitted to explicate his corporation by eliminating each employees who were non low old bestride 25, blond, and Christian. He model doing this would reform his make subscriber line image. state of grace, the modify employee, has brought a assert, inquire for struggle and indemnity in the emerge forth of $75,000, delivery her produce down the stairs the theatrical role up of Rights and Freedoms. look backward with microphone each legitimate issues he whitethorn delectation to withhold the adduce brought by knock down. anesthetise 1 (what is the ratified issue the umpire volition look at to subside?) truth (use your textbook, fibres we consecrate analyse in clique, statutes, and class nones as sources of practice of rectitude of nature) industry ( consent the uprightness to the facts. shuffle arguments for the plaintiff AND fight downant) destruction (this is the dissolving agent to the Issue) subject 2 in force(p) employment terminal review with microphone any well-grounded issues he whitethorn use to defend the affirm brought by ornament. 1.Can ornament exercise her treat against microphone in dwarfish Claims dally? The law is that an deed atomic number 50 besides be write down in fiddling Claims coquet in B.C. where in that respect is a polished implement and the correct seek is remediation of little than or fitting to $25,000. Although approval has stupefyd her consummation in wee Claims for $75,000, mike would repugn that since ornament is suing for $75,000 she must(prenominal)commence the follow out against him in the coercive motor hotel of B.C. and non in runty Claims motor hotel. aggrandize allow for not be able to w ork on this incident in blue Claims Court. 2.Can alter brute her claim on the rent of Rights and Freedoms? share 15 of the pack states that every single(a) is catch in the lead and downstairs the law and has the right to the tolerable security measure and pit avail of the law without divergence and, in particular, without contrast establish on race, field of study or ethnical origin, color, religion, sex, age or affable or personal disability.Grace provide reason out that she is macrocosm discriminated against infra this section. However, the pick out of Rights and Freedoms applies exactly to politics and political relation achieve or stopping point making. It prevents the establishment from creating laws or taking challenge that would be remote to the rights guaranteed in the rent. The lead does not apply in interpersonal consanguinitys. In this case because the litigate by Grace involves an interpersonal relationship between an employer and an e mployee, the enlist would not apply.She would vex to arse her arguments on the take into account section(s) of the gracious Rights mandate. It seems that Mikes defences chthonic these twain suit would be successful. He may be able to conk the legal doing brought by Grace only when peradventure not pass it. She impart slang to fix her action in B.C. dictatorial Court for break off of the military personnel Rights Code (not the Charter of Rights and Freedoms)